![]() Historical games don't benefit from ANYTHING AT ALL that makes warhammer 3 appealing for fantasy fans. But no historical games would have been better with warhammer mechanics. wh3 would have been a better game with some other historical games' mechanics. (There is like 0 hope of the game actually improving/evolving at this point beyond CA adding more factions/cash grabs.) We getting Hyenas and Pharaoh instead, while the team they left on WH3 muddles about making cashgrab DLCs and failing to fix massive, faction breaking bugs instead of improving the game. WH3 needed: units actually fighting each other, the rope systems from 3k, duels even, any sandbox elements whatsoever, sieges that aren't a joke, like in 3k or nearly any historical TW, and *so much more.* They're fine with entire aspects of the game being garbage as long as they keep making sales. WH3 deserved the advances they made in 3k *and* in this Pharaoh, but CA is a corner-cutting, greed driven, bottom line company that's only interested in profits and pleasuring their shareholders. WH3 though, was such a disappointment because it has very little of what made the historical TW's good. I've been playing TW since Shogun 1 and like both historical and what they initially tried to do with WHTW. they should acknowledge the two different playerbases just like paradox acknowledges theirs. Alas, here we are.īolovo původně napsal:that's the point. Warhammer total war SHOULD NOT be competing with historical total wars. Yet instead of doing they feel this strange need of having the same playerbase for all their titles. If ca actually took a shot at trying actual grand strategy in a historical game, considering that they are the only ones doing real time battles at this level, the amount of paradox players that they would attract would be gargantuan. Look at how many people play ck3, euIV and HOI4. Warhammer players SHOULDN'T like historical games in the first place, because that would mean something very wrong with a HISTORICAL title indeed. They couldn't be more different, yet we have this strange need of saying that a historical game should appeal or "bring back" players from warhammer. Their error is trying to appeal at the same time to fantasy and historical players. EUIV, CK3, HOI4 and Stellaris are completely different games. That's fine for Historical fans and fans who like both but it isn't going to be bring back Fantasy fans or Total War fans who went fantasy and can't go back. It'd basically be the same game except in a different time period and maybe a bigger map. ![]() If Pharaoh won't attract people back to historical what makes you think Medieval 3 would. Most of the people that want Med 3 will be dead by the time it ever comes out. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |